Single Page Text Only 04/03/10

Streets Need Repair

Residents who are surveying street conditions estimate that half of the city’s 800 to 900 streets need resurfacing or major repair. A city employee said the cost of bringing all streets up to standards would be $85 million.

Beyond streets that need immediate attention, a significant portion of the remaining ones are overdue for slurry-sealing. When the asphalt’s color turns gray to light gray, the waterproof seal has worn off. If the street is neglected instead of sealed, the deterioration accelerates.

Nearly 200 specific streets have now been identified by community watchdogs and other residents as needing immediate repair. Some of these streets are not scheduled for resurfacing for at least two years.

Here are the newest additions to the list, with brief descriptions of the damage. These streets are near Oso, east of Marguerite Parkway.

Betanzos – horizontal and longitudinal cracks; rough pavement. Center is cracking.

Betanzos at Claro intersection – chunk of asphalt has come loose.

Chantada – horizontal cracks with weeds, long cracks along curbs; extensive cracking.

Chantada at Lalin intersection – all cracked up; rough road.

Claro and Viana intersection – asphalt is raising up.

Claro and Comba – mosaic-like cracks; cracks in cul-de-sac.

Cloverly at Pacific Crest – cracks throughout intersection.

Cloverly – lengthy longitudinal cracks; cul-de-sac shows extensive mosaic-like cracking.

Comba – horizontal cracks in front of nearly every house.

Compostelo – horizontal cracks; ridged cracks; long areas of rough road.

Corcubion – wide horizontal cracks; some have been patched and are reopening; weeds; badly deteriorating areas. Significant longitudinal cracks.

Delemos – double lines of cracking in several places; cul-de-sac is all cracked up, weeds.

Delemos and Claro intersection – mosaic-like cracking.

Fiera – longitudinal cracks.

Glenwood and Pacific Point intersection – extensive, mosaic-like cracking.

Monforte – cul-de-sac is all cracked up; cracks along curbs at Alpera.

Monforte and Viana intersection – horizontal cracks; mosaic-like cracking.

Morro – cracks at intersection with Pacific Crest; cul-de-sac is cracked with sunken area.

Neda – all cracked up; cul-de-sac also is all cracked up; cracks 4 feet from curbs.

Noya – cul-de-sac is all cracked up; weeds; entire street is moderately cracked up.

Pacific Heights – numerous horizontal cracks; asphalt is crumbling at edge of curbs.

Pacific Hills at Glenwood – intersection is all cracked up with deep and wide cracks.

Pacific Hills at South Ridge – intersection is all cracked up.

Pacific Hills – extensive cracking with weeds; cracks between South Ridge and Pacific Heights. Horizontal cracks are every 20 feet in some sections.

Pacific Point – cul-de-sac is all cracked up; weeds, mosaic-like cracking and a pothole.

Pacific Crest and Glenwood intersection – horizontal and longitudinal cracking, weeds.

Pinario – horizontal and longitudinal cracks; cul-de-sac is moderately cracked up.

Olinda – cracking throughout cul-de-sac.

Regio – cracks with weeds; mosaic-like cracking; cul-de-sac has long cracks.

Regio and Claro intersection – cracks with weeds; mosaic-like cracks. Broken-up edges.

Rosecrest – cracking throughout cul-de-sac; weeds growing out of cracks.

South Ridge – cul-de-sac has wide, deep cracks; entire street is cracked up.

Tono – longitudinal cracks along curbs; cul-de-sac is all cracked up.

Tono and Compostelo intersection – cracks with weeds.

Viana – all cracked up; horizontal cracks, mosaic-like cracking.

CUSD Special Edition
by Craig Alexander

In October I distributed a letter from concerned Capistrano Unified School District parent Dawn Urbanek about the ongoing negotiations with the teachers unions at CUSD. On Mar. 31, the Board of Trustees at CUSD voted to implement a new contract that calls for roughly 10.1% of cuts, partly in salary, partly in unpaid furlough days and partly in increased health care insurance costs. But the new contract saves teacher jobs and keeps the number of students in each class to a manageable level - i.e., the most important people - the children will not suffer increased class sizes. At this time we do not know if the unions will strike or not.

Some of you reading these words are public school teachers or their spouses or parents. I want you to know that I feel really bad for anyone who is getting a pay cut due to this new contract. Many people in the private sector who have seen their income fall or even lost their jobs feel bad for you and your loved ones too. If I have to point a finger of blame for this, I point it at the state government that took money from the cities, counties and school districts to balance their own budget. I consider this immoral and unjust. I also blame the old corrupt Board of Trustees in the James Fleming era, which spent money like drunken sailors so that the current Reform Trustees inherited a District that was nearly out of money before the state began its cuts.

Given the Mar. 31 passage of the new contract by the Trustees at CUSD, I thought I would re-send Dawn's well researched and well written open letter. One point Dawn makes we should all remember, in the current budget of CUSD approximately 84.55% of the total budget goes to salaries and benefits of employees of the District. That leaves only 15% for the upkeep of the building facilities and for resources in the classrooms (other than the teachers themselves).

Dawn’s letter is a bit of a long read but well worth it to understand that the unions are NOT representing our children in their battles with the new board. If there are any mistakes in spelling, etc. it arises from my copying and pasting, not Dawn's original letter.

I strongly encourage you to forward this message to your friends and encourage them to read it and pass it along to their friends.

Open Letter from Dawn Urbanek

As a parent of a student in CUSD, I have attended most of the CUSD Board Meetings and Budget Workshops over the past two years, and I felt compelled to write this letter. Not every parent has time to attend meetings and workshops. Those of us who do need to start sharing our knowledge with other parents so that any letters that are written to influence the Board and/or Administrators are based on fact, and are "intelligent," "thoughtful" letters that truly reflect what we as parents feel "is in the best interest of our children."

I was really angry, and disgusted, to see teachers at my child's school standing outside the campus Friday morning... wearing black... handing out flyers. The flyers were asking parents to contact Ellen Addonizio, the President of the Capistrano School Board, and tell her to start working with teachers during contract negotiations in a "reasonable and responsible way.” 

What happened Friday was a staged event by the CUEA. The CUEA stands for the Capistrano Unified Education Association and is the professional association (teachers union) for the non-supervisory certificated employees in the Capistrano Unified School District. The flyer that was being passed out by teachers can be viewed at the CUEA web site: http://cuea.org/index2.shtml. In the top right-hand corner you will see a box that says "School Board Not the Best" Get a flyer to pass out here.

I do not appreciate the CUEA bringing their politics onto my child's campus. Putting children in the position of having to worry about whether or not their teacher will have a job next year is not beneficial to children, especially when many parents have already lost their own jobs. It is very insensitive to the many families that are suffering during these economically difficult times. 

I also want to say how disappointed I have been with the press coverage of the CUSD Budget issues. I attended the Oct. 13 CUSD Board Meeting. From the Orange County Register article: "Capistrano district identifies $9.3 million in possible cuts. Officials have a long way to go to close an anticipated $25.1 million deficit." It did not even begin to provide parents with the full flavor of what is at stake in the next round of cuts that the District will be forced to make to avoid insolvency. The full article can be found at:  http://www.ocregister.com/articles/school-district-budget-2606475-million-cuts

This is going to be a very difficult year financially for everyone in California. CUSD needs to identify $25 million in cuts to their budget by December 2009. The $25 million in cuts is based on the Budget that the State of California passed this summer. The anticipated revenues that were projected in the State budget are already wrong. The California economy is not "recovering" as anticipated. The $25 million in cuts that need to be identified by December will most likely be the first of a series of additional cuts that CUSD will need to make to its budget this year.

At the Oct. 13, 2009, CUSD Board Meeting, Ron Lebs, Deputy Superintendent, Business Support Services stated very clearly that: "... 85% of the District’s budget goes to salaries, pensions and benefits." Only 15% of the District's budget goes to "other expenses"... expenses such as books and supplies, CSR (Class Size Reduction), Block Music, AAA GATE. etc.

The fact is that CUSD can only make unilateral cuts to 15% of the entire CUSD budget. Any cuts to the other 85% of the budget must be negotiated through collective bargaining with the three employee unions in CUSD. The three unions are CUEA representing the teachers "Certificated Employees," CSEA representing support staff  "Classified Employees," and the Teamsters representing the bus drivers, etc. I encourage every parent to go to the District web site and click on <Departments<Business & Support Services and then under the second heading "CUSD Budgets as Approved" click on the following link. 2008/2009 Unaudited Actuals and 2009/2010 Revised Final Budget  Go to Exhibit B "Expenditures" (page 12) you will see the following:

Expenditures:

Total Expenditures per year 2009-2010  $381,716,882
Salaries:
  Certificated Employees  2009-2010  $193,507,709
  Classified Employees   2009-2010  $  57,262,822
Employee Benefits      2009-2010  $  72,388,033
Total Salaries, pensions and benefits  $323,158,586

$ 323,158,586 of the total $ 381,716.882 spent at CUSD goes to Salaries, Pensions and Benefits. 84.66% of CUSD's budget goes to Salaries, Pensions and Benefits.

The reality is that if the District is not successful in negotiating some cuts to salaries, pensions and benefits, then all of the cuts will come from the 15% of the budget that goes directly to our children. The sad truth is that even if every one of the cuts listed below were made it would only total $9.3 million dollars.

The cuts that are being proposed are as follows:

  • $1.66 million: Eliminate funding for all extra-curricular activities, and all stipends for department chairs
  • $1.3 million: Eliminate funding for all sports programs
  • $1.2 million: Capture the savings from lower-than-anticipated costs for employee health insurance
  • $1.2 million: Eliminate the 25-to-1 pupil-teacher ratio in the first grade
  • $1 million: Eliminate elementary school block music
  • $1 million: Remove this money from a district fund for facilities maintenance, leaving $2.6 million in the fund over the next four years
  • $0.7 million: Close two small elementary schools
  • $0.5 million: Delay purchasing new textbooks per the standard textbook adoption cycle
  • $0.25 million: Eliminate all summer school in grades K-8
  • $0.21 million: Reorganize the district's business services department
  • $0.14 million: Eliminate the college-level International Baccalaureate program in high schools
  • $0.1 million: Eliminate resident substitutes at high schools, and use a district list instead to find substitute teachers.

From one parent to another, I ask you, what is in the best interest of our children?

1. Preserving currently scheduled increases to salaries, pensions, and benefits? or

2. Preserving class sizes, sports programs, Block Music, and all the programs that materially affect the quality of education that our children receive?

Is preserving current projected increases to salaries, pensions, and benefits more important than maintaining our public school buildings? We already have many over-crowded classrooms where the number of children exceeds the number of desks in the classroom, and the number of children in the class exceeds City fire and safety codes.

I volunteer hundreds of hours of my time to my child's school. I donate hundreds of dollars in time and money for school fundraisers. When my child's teacher needs supplies, I personally pay for and donate, paper, pencils, pens, etc. (the list grows larger every year).

Next time the CUEA asks your teacher to stand outside of school and pass out a flyer asking for you to write a letter encouraging the Board to work with teachers during contract negotiations in a "reasonable and responsible way" remember one important thing: Parents are the only Advocates children have.

The CUEA is a union. It is a union's job to negotiate the best labor contract for its union members. Unions do not represent our children. In economically difficult times such as these if we as parents write letters in support of the union’s efforts to maintain scheduled increases to salaries, pensions and benefits, then we must also understand that means we support making the necessary cuts to the 15% of the budget that goes directly to our children.

Another issue that has not been covered by the press, but should have some bearing on what is the "reasonable and responsible" is the following: The CUSD final Budget that passed on June 22, 2009 contained automatic step and column salary increases and projected health and welfare benefit premium increases. That means that to date, CUEA members are still getting salary increases!

I encourage every parent to go to the District web site and click on <Administration<Board Meetings and then under September 15, 2009 click on "Budget Summary Recap" and you will see that Salaries and Benefits are scheduled to increase for 2009/2010 by:

Certificated Employees 2009-2010           $4,225,298
Classified Employees   2009-2010           $1,804,487
Employee Benefits      2009-2010           $4,154,316

Go to the District web site and click on <Administration<Board Meetings and then under September 15, 2009, click on "Budget Reduction Up-date."

The District saved $9.7 million dollars by increasing class sizes this year. If the unions had agreed not to take their projected salary increases this year, the District could have saved CSR for every student in K - 3.

Cumulative increases in Salaries, pensions and benefits are projected to total over $ 44.7 million dollars over the next five years. Go to the District web site and click on <Administration<Board Meetings and then under June 8, 2009 click on "Budget Workshop Presentation" page 8 and you will see the following:
 

Salary & Benefits
09/10    $8.1 million
10/11    $8.5 million
11/12    $8.9 million
12/13    $9.4 million
13/14    $9.8 million

There is currently no "new" contract between CUSD and the CUEA, which means that the old contract is still in force. While most people across the nation have taken at least a 10% reduction in pay, the CUEA has not agreed to a single cut in salaries, pensions and benefits, and are in fact still receiving projected salary increases. What is the "reasonable and responsible way" to cut $25 million from the CUSD budget? Should the children be the only ones to bear the burden of these cuts?

Dawn Urbanek
CUSD Parent and Advocate for my child.

Group Organizes Mission Viejo TEA Party
Press Release

Mission Viejo residents will participate in a Taxed Enough Already (TEA) Party on Thurs., April 15. Community members are invited to join the nationwide protest with a rally at the center of town, on the corners of La Paz and Marguerite. The Mission Viejo TEA Party will begin at 5:00 p.m. and continue until 6:30 p.m.

Organizing the event are members of Saddleback Republican Assembly, a unit of California Republican Assembly. Matt Corrigan, president of SRA, said the event will be a reunion for many TEA Party participants. Approximately 600 people attended the first TEA Party in Mission Viejo on April 15, 2009.

Mission Viejo TEA Party patriots are rallying to exercise their freedom of speech and oppose the growth of government and spending. Their concerns include the government takeover of healthcare, trillions of borrowed dollars for future generations to repay, redistribution of wealth, punishment for responsible behavior and rewards for irresponsible behavior.

Corrigan said, “We’re inviting community members of all ages and political parties to join our peaceful protest on April 15. We’re standing up to protect our freedoms and the Constitution on which our country was founded.”

Signs will be available at the rally, but participants are encouraged to create their own signs and bring American flags to wave. Look for information and updates on MissionViejoDispatch.com, MissionViejoCA.org and the county’s premier news blog, OrangeJuiceBlog.com.

The Buzz

Thank you to Councilwoman Cathy Schlicht and community watchdog Brad Morton for challenging Councilman Frank Ury’s false ballot statement. A Superior Court judge ruled last week that Ury’s ballot rebuttal against the Mission Viejo Right To Vote (Measure “D”) contained false or misleading claims. Before filing a public-interest lawsuit, Schlicht asked the city clerk to challenge Ury’s statement. When the clerk declined to act, Schlicht enlisted legal help from Morton, an attorney, to file a Writ of Mandate to remove Ury’s false claims from the June 8 election material. Read the details on Morton’s blog, http://missionviejodispatch.com/?p=15820

              ***

Among statements disallowed by the judge, Ury falsely said the Casta del Sol Golf Course was never in danger of being developed for housing. Do Mission Viejo residents remember receiving a letter and color brochure from Sunrise Assisted Living, proposing 350 residential units on the golf course? Golfers said the developer staked the property for housing, and the project was moving forward until the developer ran into financial trouble. As a strategy to deflect residents’ concern about destruction of the golf course, the council created a phony moratorium on rezoning. The moratorium expired shortly after the Feb. 2 election to recall Lance MacLean from the council.

              ***

A Mission Viejo resident responded to blog articles about street conditions: “I can’t imagine other streets are worse than Via Escolar, Plata, Jacinto, Mirar Vista, Poco, Oliva, Boleada, Oso Rojo, Consuela, La Quilla and De La Luna. Please add them to the list. Does the city not have funds to maintain the streets or do city officials not care?”

              ***

The city apparently has money for more pillars. Despite public outcry against the pillars on Crown Valley Parkway, the council majority of Ury, Kelley and Leckness recently voted to place pillars on medians along Oso Parkway. Drivers have noticed that the asphalt on Marguerite Parkway adjacent to the pillars (just south of Crown Valley) is in poor condition.

              ***

City hall is a happy place where only good news is spoken. For example, city newsletters each week talk about new businesses opening but rarely mention any business closing. If such spin were true, all retail centers in town would have 100 percent occupancy.

              ***

Forwarded by Carl Schulthess, Editor-in-Chief and founder of MissionViejoCA.org. Words of wisdom from an unknown author: “Like most folks in this country, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes, and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test (with which I have no problem). What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. So, here is my question: Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check when I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, however, have a problem with helping those doing drugs while I work. We could call the program URINE OR YOU'RE OUT."

To Comment on this article please provide the following information, the press “Submit Comment”. You must provide your name to submit a comment.

If you would like your comment considered for publication in a future NewsBlog, check the “Contact Me” box. If your comment is selected for publication, you will be contacted via email or phone.

Name

E-Mail or Phone Number

Comment

Contact Me