Mission Viejo Taxpayers Vote Against MUKs Guest Editorial
When asked by our fellow citizens on the street who they should vote for in the City Council elections among all those running for office, we gave this very simple answer. Vote out the MUKs!
Who are the MUKs, you ask. They are the existing city council majority members who have consistently approved spending money on projects, we, the majority of taxpayers, do not need.
Name a project we do not need, you ask. The Marguerite Tennis Center renovation. They want to add one (1) tennis court to the already existing seven (7) courts, at the cost of an estimated $3.7 million. This is typical of their thinking.
What are the names of the MUKs, you ask. Prior to the recall of MacLean, they were: MacLean………Ury………Kelley.
After the recall election, MacLean was replaced by Leckness. Leckness voted after that election to give the lifetime insurance to the city council members, even though as a businessman he said he would not do that for his employees.
In effect, the MUKs are still in place, and MacLean is running again for city council in November. He and the other MUK members feel the additional tennis court is desperately needed. When asked of the city council why this desperation, they failed to come up with an answer.
The answer to the original question is simple! Since those incumbents do not speak for the majority of the taxpayers, the MUKs should be voted out of office in November.
Get the word out before we have more projects desperately needed like we described.
Thank you, Voters United
|